I doubt I'll be able to convince you not to kill me. "I'm not the killer!" Didn't convince you? Yeah, that's all I got. Hear me out though, since you know there's a 66% chance I'm innocent.
I don't think I've done anything suspicious. I haven't lurked quietly to escape notice, I haven't called for anyone's head. Meanwhile Vardaen nominated Nate, nominated me, and got Wayloss killed. He also suggested that Nate wasn't the sage when he clearly was:
That seemed a little suspicious to me. It looked like he was trying to discredit the sage in advance in case he got scanned. That might be why Nate almost nominated him yesterday before deciding instead to wait a day.Vardaen wrote: I'm not so sure not killing someone is a smart idea... we are still going on the assumption that Nate isn't the other killer and he's just playing us really really good.
I don't think that is the case but you never know.
And if Nate was suspicious enough to nominate Vardaen guess who he was going probably to scan that night? I think Nate got killed, despite the threat of a watcher, because Vardaen knew he had nothing to lose and he was better off arguing against an unconfirmed watchman than an accepted sage.Nate wrote: I nominate Frenchy!
Wait scratch that, I say we kill nobody...
Look, Vardaen plays aggressively and nominates a lot of people, whether a killer or innocent. But I think he's a more likely killer than Kilroy and I can guarantee killing me will lose the game for us.
Just because the die is cast doesn't mean you have to blindly follow it to a loss. Grimbold, Kilroy, I hope you will trust your gut and vote no. And Vardaen, if you're not the killer I hope you will vote no too and make a case why Kilroy is the killer. Because it's definitely not me. It doesn't do any good to spare your own life if the killer still escapes execution.